A byline that is not a reel
A structured post — claim, evidence, limit, conflicts — sits next to our briefings. Instagram cannot hold a limit line. We can. That is the product psychologists actually lack.
Named people
Write here if you can hold a limit line
Psychologists do not owe us unpaid content. The deal is a serious byline, paid review when we need a clinician’s hours, and the right to mark where a companion sketch is wrong. Not a lead farm.
Why it is mutual
Paid review, not harvested clients
We pay for hours that improve a hiring instrument or a search audit. We do not sell your patients to an employer. Overflow referrals are optional and named, never scraped from a companion log.
A counterweight to the bot
If companions exist, clinicians should be able to mark where the sketch is wrong. That makes the institute safer and gives the expert a public correction with a DOI-like stamp. Mutual: they keep the profession from being replaced by a mirror; we keep the mirror from lying.
The only post format
- 01
Claim
One sentence you will still sign in a year.
- 02
Evidence
Papers, cases, or a method. Links, not vibes.
- 03
Limit
What this does not prove.
- 04
Conflicts
Who pays you. Including us, if we do.