NOOS
ENRU

Addiction and families

Families affected by addiction: what research knows and what it does not

Research describes a relative's addiction as a lasting source of stress for the family: shock, isolation and stigma, strain on health and relationships. One family-based approach, CRAFT, has been tested in trials. With it, about two in three reluctant relatives entered treatment. That was more often than with Al-Anon facilitation — counselling that encourages the family member to join Al-Anon groups — or with a planned family confrontation. The outcome is entering treatment, not recovery. Family members' own well-being improved about equally with each approach. Most of this evidence concerns alcohol and the United States.

PublishedResearch summaryPublished Mostly United States, plus international reviews

What we conclude

Living with a relative's addiction is common and stressful, and researchers treat the family member as a person under strain, not as a patient. Approaches that work with the family can raise the chance that a reluctant relative starts treatment; this measures entering treatment, not recovery, and rests on few trials, mostly about alcohol. Help for family members in their own right is still scarce and weakly tested.

What we will not claim

Most trials concern alcohol and were run in the United States; the main outcome is whether the relative enters treatment, not recovery. Studies of family members' own well-being do not compare with receiving no help. This page is not a plan of action, does not describe signs of addiction, and does not assess anyone; it does not replace professional help.

If you are in immediate danger, contact local emergency services. For suicidal thoughts, go to iasp.info/suicidalthoughts. Find help

How many families this touches

A US federal report based on the 2009–2014 national drug use survey estimated that in an average year about 8.7 million children under 17 — 12.3% — lived with at least one parent who had a substance use disorder in the past year: about 7.5 million (10.5%) with a parent with an alcohol use disorder and about 2.1 million (2.9%) with a parent with an illicit drug use disorder; the groups overlap. These are parents' self-reports for one country, and living in such a home does not by itself mean a child was harmed. Worldwide, one review suggests there may be around 100 million adult family members affected by a relative's addiction, a large but neglected share of the burden of illness; the authors call this group uncounted, and the figure is a rough estimate.

What happens to the family

A 2023 systematic review of qualitative studies described recurring themes in families' experience, among them an initial shock; a family "in a fog" of isolation and stigma; a chain of emotional and physical strain and burden; and chaos inside the family, with unstable relationships. In a German study of 21 mothers and 9 fathers of adult children with addiction, mothers more often described emotional stress, guilt and shame, and fathers conflicts involving violence; guilt, shame and fear of stigma were the main barriers to seeking help. Qualitative studies describe experience, not how often it happens; the review covered English-language studies only, and the German parents were recruited through self-help groups, so they may differ from other parents.

How researchers describe a relative's experience

The stress–strain–coping–support model, developed by Jim Orford and colleagues from research in Mexico, England, Australia and Italy, does not treat the family member as ill. A relative's addiction is a source of stress; it leads to strain and a risk to health; how the family member copes and how much social support they have shape that strain. A 2026 scoping review of 64 studies found two broad ways relatives cope: trying to influence the relative's behaviour, or protecting their own and the family's well-being; 64% of the studies were about substances and 26% about gambling. This is a model and a map of studies, not a measured law or a guide to what to do; the review did not assess which way works better, and there is little data outside the countries studied.

Helping a reluctant relative into treatment: what trials found

CRAFT (Community Reinforcement and Family Training) works with the family member rather than the person with the addiction. In a 1999 US randomized trial with 130 relatives of drinkers who were not motivated to seek treatment — 12 hours of counselling and 12-month follow-up — CRAFT led to treatment entry for 64% of the drinkers, against 13% with Al-Anon facilitation and 30% with the Johnson intervention, a planned family confrontation. In the Johnson group, 70% of families did not go ahead with the confrontation; of those who did, 75% saw their relative enter treatment — small subgroups. A 2010 meta-analysis of four trials with 264 family members found that CRAFT led to treatment entry 3.25 times as often as Al-Anon or Nar-Anon (95% CI 2.11–5.02) and 2.15 times as often as the Johnson intervention (95% CI 1.28–3.62); about two thirds of relatives entered treatment, usually after four to six sessions. Boundaries: the meta-analysis rests on only four trials; the outcome is starting treatment, not recovery; the evidence is mostly about alcohol in the United States. A Stockholm randomized trial with 113 parents of young adults compared CRAFT with counselling; a secondary analysis found that prior treatment experience and parents' self-efficacy predicted treatment entry, together explaining 16% of the variance. It is a secondary analysis of one trial in Sweden, and these predictors are not a list of what to do.

When the relative is already in treatment: couples therapy

A 2008 meta-analysis of 12 randomized trials with 754 participants compared behavioural couples therapy with individual treatment. Overall it had an advantage (d = 0.54): for frequency of use d = 0.36, for consequences of use d = 0.52 and for relationship satisfaction d = 0.57; at later follow-up it was better in all three areas (d 0.45–0.51). Boundaries: this applies only to couples in which the person with the addiction is already in treatment, and right after treatment the advantage was clear only for the relationship (d = 0.64).

What is known about help for family members themselves

Orford and colleagues note that help for family members in their own right, not as an add-on to the relative's treatment, is almost absent; they describe a five-step method, but that paper does not show it works. In the 1999 trial, family members' well-being and relationship quality improved about equally in all three groups, and in the 2010 meta-analysis relatives' psychosocial and physical state improved with each of the three programs over six months; neither compared with receiving no help. A 2022 pilot trial in Goa, India, with 101 family members found that brief help from lay counsellors did not differ from usual care on symptoms after three months, only on social support; it was small, so no difference does not prove no effect. Al-Anon is an existing mutual-help form for family members. Among 279 pairs of alcohol inpatients and their family members in the United States, those who went to Al-Anon were more often older, white, religious, abstinent, and in worse mental health; this describes who attends, not whether it helps.

Sources